wikipedia as a social service
Wednesday, February 21st, 2007I’ve had this discussion recently with someone, I can’t remember whom, about what services are appropriate as Social (government backed) and Private (hands off). When it comes right down to it, I think there are two basic classifications for things that I feel are suitable for government support, whether it be financial or legislative: public necessities (water, electricity, transportation, etc), and betterment of humanity (NASA, DHS, etc). Bear with me, this is just a sketch of an opinion.
Now wikipedia is something that’s kind of controversial because of its very public and democratic nature. Read that again… blah blah blah CONTROVERSIAL blah blah DEMOCRATIC. This is a repository for information that uses the public for submission of information, and is continuously being checked by editors and experts for things like accuracy, balance and relevance. It only accepts donation money, because many still feel that advertising would make it non-objective and commercial, which is not appropriate for a mass-encyclopedia.
Wikipedia also suffers from a very high barrier to entry. In order to participate, you have to be able to speak the wiki language, which is not very easy. It favors programmers in that way, so it is likely to have information highly skewed to the interests of those people. In order to remove this barrier, it is believed that 30-50 full-time developers could comb through submissions and enter the information themselves. This is unaffordable because of the lack of sufficient funding.
It just struck me that this could be a valuable public service, for the betterment of humanity. And who better to help collect the 21st century’s information, as provided by the residents therein, then the Library of Congress? It’s quite possible that funding, protection and staff from the LOC could give wikipedia what it needs to maintain its objectivity, to continue to foster democratic croudsourcing of information, and make it a reliable source of information for school children.
Besides, the $2M+ / yr that it would take to keep it up and running is a drop in the bucket compared to, say… how much it costs per year to clean the Capitol Building’s drapes. And how often do you use those?
